EnigmA Amiga Run 1997 July/EnigmA AMIGA RUN 20 (1997)(G.R. Edizioni)(IT)[!][issue 1997-07 & 08][EAR-CD IV].iso/lightwave/lwmlist/95.lightwave-08/000094_owner-lightwav…bcom.webcom.com_Wed Aug 9 07:20:02 1995.msg

Internet Message Format | 1995-09-02 | 2KB

Received: by webcom.webcom.com
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA145798001; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 07:20:02 -0700
Return-Path: <[e-mail]>
Received: from fafnir.rx.uga.edu by webcom.webcom.com with ESMTP
    (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA145727997; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 07:19:57 -0700
Received: (from drowley@localhost) by fafnir.rx.uga.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA12981; Wed, 9 Aug 1995 10:11:23 -0400
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 1995 10:11:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Dennis Rowley <[e-mail]>
To: lightwave list <[e-mail]>
Subject: Graphics resolutions for video
Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [e-mail]
Precedence: bulk

Here's a question I expect varied opinions on:

When rendering graphics, e.g. on Photoshop, at 640x480 size in order to
transfer to video and do DVE's, what is the ideal resolution (dpi) to work
with so that you don't use anymore storage space than necessary, but do
not compromise on the final video output?
    One production outfit has said that going higher than 72dpi was
useless, since NTSC didn't do any better than this, but I have seen that
a higher dpi number WILL keep things cleaner.  But how high do you go?

DMR

--
Dennis Rowley <[e-mail]> sent this message.
To Post a Message           : [e-mail]
Un/Subscription Requests To : [e-mail]
(DIGEST)                 or : [e-mail]
Administrative Items To     : [e-mail]